Reviews

Reviews assess the value of a university activity, service or policy.

Reviews aim to answer questions such as, "Is this activity meeting student needs as intended?", and, "How can we improve it?".

Reviews are integral to the UTS quality management cycle.

List of UTS reviews

2008

Review Review sponsor
Review of Setting the Pace Senior Deputy Vice-Chancellor
Review of UTS Planning and Quality Management Framework Senior Deputy Vice-Chancellor

2007

Review Review sponsor
Review of CERCS Policy Senior Deputy Vice-Chancellor
Review of Academic Board Senior Deputy Vice-Chancellor

2006

Review Review sponsor
AUQA Audit (PDF) (Access: UTS staff only) Deputy Vice-Chancellor
Review of the Quality of Teaching and Learning Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Teaching and Learning)
Review of implementation of the Changing Work Project Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Teaching and Learning)
Review of Recognition of Prior Learning Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Teaching and Learning)
Review of Student Attrition Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Teaching and Learning)
Shopfront Review (Word .doc format) (Access: UTS staff only) Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Teaching and Learning)

2005

Review Review sponsor
Review of achievements against UTS key strategic plans 2001-2004 Deputy Vice-Chancellor
Rules Review Project Registrar
Review of performance measurement: development of KPI scorecard Deputy Vice-Chancellor
Student Administration Service Delivery Review Registrar
Review of delegations Registrar
Review of policy framework Registrar


List of UTS Reviews 2000 - 2004 (PDF Staff Access Only)

The UTS Planning website provides staff access to background papers prepared while the current strategic plan was being developed.

PQU coordinates implementation of the UTS Review Framework, which incorporates two main types of reviews:

Thematic reviews consider key strategic issues or activities related to the achievement of the strategic objectives of the University.
This form of review is generally a major component of a broader change management initiative with which the University is involved.
The 2005 Student Administration Service Delivery Review is an example of a major thematic review.
Embedded reviews are based on the notion of localised continuous improvement throughout the University. 
These can apply to courses, subjects or administrative processes.

The Vice-Chancellor may also initiate discretionary reviews as deemed appropriate.

The UTS Review Framework - Vice-Chancellor's Operational Directive provides detail on how the survey is administered.

PQU's role in supporting implementation of the Review Framework includes:

 

 

For more information...

The Planning and Quality Management pages at the PQU website are managed by PQU's Strategic Planning and Improvement Team. For more information, please contact Fiona Ruzicka.